Case Completeness Audits primarily review which two components?

Case Completeness Audits are fundamental in ensuring that a cancer registry has accurately captured all the necessary cases for reporting and analysis. The primary focus of these audits is on the procedures that identify cases and the specific sources from which those cases are obtained.

By reviewing casefinding procedures, registrars can assess how effectively they are identifying patients diagnosed with cancer. This includes evaluating the methods used for gathering new cases, which may involve monitoring hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and other relevant medical encounters.

Similarly, examining casefinding sources allows registrars to determine whether all potential avenues for case identification are being utilized. This could include various healthcare facilities, pathologies, and public health departments that might provide cancer-related data.

These two components are critical in maintaining the integrity and completeness of the registry, ensuring that it reflects an accurate count of cancer cases within the defined population. This accuracy is essential for epidemiological studies, healthcare resource allocation, and improving patient outcomes through informed decision-making.