When is a patient record considered an analytic case?

A patient record is considered an analytic case when it involves treatment that is intended to cure cancer. This classification is essential in cancer registries, as analytic cases are those that contribute valuable data regarding the effectiveness of treatment strategies and outcomes for specific types of cancer. The emphasis on curative treatment helps to ensure that the data collected is focused on cases where the goal is to achieve a positive long-term outcome for the patient.

In cancer registry practice, the purpose of identifying analytic cases is to gather information that can guide treatment protocols, improve patient care, and enhance research into cancer therapies. A case is typically identified as analytic if the diagnosis and the treatment have implications for understanding cancer trends, treatment efficacy, and survival rates.

The other options do not encapsulate the primary intent of what defines an analytic case in cancer registries. For instance, the notion of diagnosis following treatment does not inherently relate to the curative aspect of care. Similarly, while cases requiring multiple forms of intervention may be complex, they do not specifically indicate a curative intent. Lastly, being part of an ongoing study does not automatically categorize a record as analytic unless the study is specifically focused on curative treatments and outcomes.